🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to reinitiate nuclear negotiations with the United States as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said exclusively dialogue produced results, and disclosed new appeals had originated from mediators to reopen negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran was not yet able to authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Walking a Complex Route

Araghchi is navigating a challenging route since Iran does not want be perceived to be operating from a position of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out more powerful defensively and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Discussions Suddenly Concluded

The prior phases of negotiations between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with US support, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that concluded with Donald Trump asserting the sites had been eliminated. Subsequently, Western states exercised their privilege to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an local partnership with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the discussions that American atomic experts could work within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Officials asserted three times they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Current Situation

Iran's diplomats declared the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the offer could be revived in various formats if negotiations reopen.

The US president in recent days stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to restart talks, but in private Iranian officials say they are not yet getting coherent offers from Washington either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been charged of passivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran states diplomacy is not part of a show.

Negotiating Stance

In his speech to the forum, designed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the idea of international law, Araghchi declared the 12-day war showed the clash could not be resolved by military means. He stated the attacks commenced with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with full US knowledge and cooperation, making faith difficult to rebuild.

Diplomacy Stays the Final Answer

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had deserted dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had repeatedly attempted to enforce their will during the discussions. Dialogue can still be active and remains the primary answer to settle disagreements, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be respected."

"In case they address to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of respect and honor, they will get a reply in the identical language."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the struggle of repair and reconstruction, the foreign minister claimed he was certain Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We gained multiple understandings from this engagement; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He added: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to eliminate, remains in place. The sites and gear, if eliminated, will be restored; what is essential is the will of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but did not succeed to break. The Iranian people have grown more powerful, more integrated, and more endorsing of the administration and the country in the wake of this assault."